<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Sena &amp; Partners</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.senaiplaw.com/en/</provider_url><title>Thoughts on the Unified Patent Court - Sena &amp; Partners</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="N1PW1fIJGh"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.senaiplaw.com/en/2025/01/13/thoughts-on-the-unified-patent-court/"&gt;Thoughts on the Unified Patent Court&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.senaiplaw.com/en/2025/01/13/thoughts-on-the-unified-patent-court/embed/#?secret=N1PW1fIJGh" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Thoughts on the Unified Patent Court&#x201D; &#x2014; Sena &amp; Partners" data-secret="N1PW1fIJGh" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(d.addEventListener)e=!0;if(d.wp=d.wp||{},!d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),c=0;c&lt;n.length;c++)n[c].style.display="none";for(c=0;c&lt;s.length;c++)if(r=s[c],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=l.createElement("a"),i=l.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,o.test(i.protocol))if(i.host===a.host)if(l.activeElement===r)d.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),d.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!o){o=!0;for(var e,t,r,a=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),i=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),n=0;n&lt;s.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=s[n]).getAttribute("data-secret")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+="#?secret="+r,t.setAttribute("data-secret",r);if(a||i)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:r},"*")}}}}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>We tried to retrace the history of the Unified Patent Court: is its creation really so innovative? Maria Carla De Cesari of Norme &amp; Tributi for Il Sole 24 Ore took our rereading backwards, from the Paris Convention onwards, which opened up new scenarios. Here is the article, by Prof. Giuseppe Sena and Elisabetta Berti [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.senaiplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Sena.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>1200</thumbnail_height></oembed>
